<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>a time to tear down | A Time to Build Up - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-a90e9719" type="application/json"/><link>http://peterennsonline.disqus.com/</link><description>Official web site of Dr. Peter Enns, author and theologian</description><atom:link href="http://peterennsonline.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:46:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Barna Survey on Young Adults Leaving the Church</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/12/23/barna-survey-on-young-adults-leaving-the-church/#comment-412365381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If these weren't the  reasons, they would find others. We should not attempt to cater to anyone's need for "experience"!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Sit There</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/12/14/just-sit-there/#comment-390441842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Doctor Enns. As a former student of yours, I'm fascinated with your work and can't wait to read your latest due shortly. However, I'm wondering why we're not literally digging deeper. Prior to attending Westminster, I took various Archaeology, Anthropology, and Sociology classes undergrad. And just like the interpretation of various hebrew words, did students interpret artifacts, features, and bones. I do think a time comes in the life of a Christian where he or she ponders the concept of social location in an existential wilderness. I think we need to examine various cultural and contextual apparatuses from the vantage point of Paul (who felt like he was regarded the scum of the earth at times) Jesus, who had no place to lay his head, and the exiled John. I'd like to see conversations like, why is the blue whale at the Museum of Natural History modeled in the flesh, so to speak, whereas many whales have the skeletal similarities of Dinosaurs. How about North American Paleo Indians, purportedly hunting 8500 yrs ago? Why is the half life of C14...5000 yrs? Then there's "Justification," held to like a form of belief or "ism" when really Paul may have been using this term practically in a negative sense, since we are all legal creatures, largely involved in the act of self justification. It certainly is a call for evaluation, yet our current culture makes this evaluation positively for a goal of success over against the concept of delay of self gratification in order to avert cycles that make one unproductive. And the first one with a popular roadmap on the mechanics of success, whether evangelical or atheistic gets the prize. Such is not the call of Job in his distress, who felt like a sea monster. I think I'm going to write a book to cycle through the scholasticism taken for granted, community by community. Please guide me to any literature that doesn't combine science with social justice. I don't think there is any.&lt;br&gt;Affectionately, Brad Winslow&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:34:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Benefit of Doubt: Coming to Terms with Faith in a Postmodern Era</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/11/24/the-benefit-of-doubt-coming-to-terms-with-faith-in-a-post-modern-era/#comment-368181853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty good post! I enjoyed reading this post. This post is exactly what I'm looking for to read about very informative. I'll look forward for your next post. Thanks&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">houston emergency room</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Mohler on the Bible and Evolution</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/10/11/al-mohler-in-the-bible-and-evolution/#comment-332453258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A brilliant post. Mohler et al may believe that by 'holding the line' against evolution they are protecting the faith and safeguarding the Church. Anecdotally at least I've seen plenty of indication to the contrary: the fact that prominent leaders like Mohler still dispute well-established science leads many to conclude the new atheists are right: Christianity is anti-rational, close-minded and stuck in the past. What's the effect of this on the countless who are questioning, doubting, struggling with their faith, or wondering why Christianity should be given consideration? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amcleay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:58:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview: My Ecclesiastes Commentary: Be There</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/09/27/interview-my-ecclesiastes-commentary-be-there/#comment-332404110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its been a popular series! Thanks again Peter!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kurt Willems</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:22:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving to Patheos</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/10/06/moving-to-patheos/#comment-329333532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like a good move. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brandon Withrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:42:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving to Patheos</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/10/06/moving-to-patheos/#comment-329093942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice! I used to be the Mormon Portal editor there. (We met in NYC at your NYAC lecture. I hung around and asked you about Paul's view on Adam and death before the fall...)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben S</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:10:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving to Patheos</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/10/06/moving-to-patheos/#comment-329030904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, James. I may be over to borrow a cup of sugar or something.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteenns</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:41:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving to Patheos</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/10/06/moving-to-patheos/#comment-328994108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I look forward to seeing you 'round the "neighborhood"! :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James F. McGrath</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Bible Curriculum “Telling God’s Story” coming in February 2011</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/07/05/new-bible-curriculum-telling-gods-story-coming-in-february-2011/#comment-295690135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished reading Telling God's Story (beautifully and impeccably written; concise yet thorough).&lt;br&gt;I not only feel inspired and encouraged in my calling to teach my children the Word because of the sensible approach presented,  but I was also refreshed in my own journey of faith. Thanks so much for making this guidebook available. &lt;br&gt;I'll be looking for your middle school teaching tools. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">careforall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 01:09:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-278354293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds an interesting read, I first heard of it from The Gospel Coalition when Kevin DeYoung reviewed it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-257218548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I don't buy into the divorce between the descriptive and the normative, I don't have trouble thinking it's possible. I was just curious how he did it. I guess I'll find out when I read the book.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Heyduck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-257111389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Richard, I suppose the question is "why can't he?" He may be in a unique position to see things more clearly. But, more importantly, publishers pick titles to grab readers' attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteenns</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:05:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-254011213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How does his sociological account defend the apparently normative claim of his subtitle?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Heyduck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 12:21:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-248211983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I got linked over here from a comment under my blog post. Glad I did. Definitely want to read this book... And if anyone wants to read that post, here's the link: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"Miniblog #71: The Bible is 'Man-Made'" &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://carsontclark.wordpress.com/2011/07/10/miniblog-71-the-bible-is-man-made/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://carsontclark.wordpress....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carsontclark</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:14:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-247899412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is easily accessible--far easier than GWHW. Also, it is not a book that argues anything about the Bible from the Bible, but more observes evangelical behavior. So, comparing to GWHW and I&amp;amp;I is comparing apples and oranges.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteenns</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-247840303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So is this an academic tome, or something that could be appreciated by the somewhat informed layman?  How does it compare (in terms of, for example, background knowledge required or theological complexity) to your I &amp;amp; I, or to Kenton Sparks' "God's Word in Human Words"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AHH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have Evangelicals Made the Bible Impossible? (a sociologist says &amp;#8220;yes&amp;#8221;)</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/11/have-evangelicals-made-the-bible-impossible-a-sociologist-says-yes/#comment-247779137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the lead, Pete!  Consider it on my Amazon wishlist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Beidler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:53:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pre-order Ecclesiastes and Evolution of Adam</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/09/pre-order-ecclesiastes-and-evolution-of-adam/#comment-246698010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope a get a book instead of a car.  Books are much more enjoyable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting on a New Book</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/02/starting-on-a-new-book/#comment-241591338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to see you and Al in a boxing ring. That would be more fun. Still I will read the book anyway (If Bird is writing, I am reading :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jace</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting on a New Book</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/02/starting-on-a-new-book/#comment-240880582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2013 seems too far off the get excited but I am anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John H. Armstrong</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:57:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting on a New Book</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/02/starting-on-a-new-book/#comment-240848625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I doubt it, Paul, for, you see, the fate of the gospel lies in the balance. 2000 years of history, all coming down to this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteenns</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:41:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting on a New Book</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/02/starting-on-a-new-book/#comment-240848426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We all gave our list of passages we would like to see covered and will find out in a couple of months. If my passages don't get picked I plan on pitching a fit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peteenns</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting on a New Book</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/02/starting-on-a-new-book/#comment-240847248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will really be looking forward to this book. In the meantime, I thoroughly enjoyed your announcement. Will Counterpoints let you write your portions of the book in the same inimitable style?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Bruggink</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:35:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting on a New Book</title><link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/07/02/starting-on-a-new-book/#comment-240841706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What will the three passages be, if I may be so bold?  Would love to take a look at them beforehand (by several years) and conjure up my own thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Beidler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:13:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>